Children who are brought up in families which do not have enough money are better prepared to deal with the problem of adult life than children who are brought up wealthy parents, discuss both views and your view.
Financial instability in families can be seen all over the world. An argument is there which states that the children who are suffering financial limitations from their infancy onward get a chance to face problems at adult age easily but the children who are wealthy have difficulty in dealing problems at their matured age. This essay analyses both view points and arrive at my personal conclusion.
On the one hand, it is a well-known fact that one of the formal Indian presidents Dr. K R Narayanan came from an impoverished family. There are lots of such kinds of examples in the history books and also in the society. Such children could learn and understand difficulties in life from their younger age. This experience could be implemented in their life easily. Thus this statement always comes true in our society.
Furthermore, wealthy children sometimes fail in their life due to more facilities being offered. To exemplify, children who have wealthy parents are always trying to give more money for their life betterment but in reality it is totally different. Most of the drug abuses are reporting from wealthy children. In addition, such students did not experience any troubled moments in their life. Therefore, they are being mislead their path and follow the enjoyments.
However, I totally disagree these both views due to several reasons. Firstly, it is an undeniable fact that, children’s life, mainly depends on how much moral values they get from their young age. This is not only for wealthy children’s life but also influences the poor community in a positive way. Thus, a moral and efficient environment enable everyone to cope up the problems in their life.
To conclude, it is a true fact that, atmosphere where children are brought up has negative and positive impact in their adult life. However, It is better to give more moral values in child’s life at earlier age that can foster an efficient generation in our society .
330 words, band 7
Some people prefer to help those who need it in local communities directly, However some people prefer to give money to national and international charitable organization. Which do you think better, discuss both view and your opinion?
In the globalized world it can be seen that a huge number of suffering people are seeking help from others. There are some multitude who think that it is better to select needy people from their surrounding but others prefer to provide donation to charity organisations. This essay will analyse both view points and finally give my personal opinion.
On the one hand , it is an undeniable fact that, our local communities include lots of poor people, who do not get right care from authorities and society. Hence , it is better to help those needy people from their own society because people who are willing to give donation as well as other sorts of help can ensure that it is reaching to the hands of genuine people. This kind of helping scheme ensures credible recipients for the amount donated as charity.
On the other hand, it is well-know fact that, people from region or society are struggling for some basic items like food, cloths shelter and so on. Perhaps the best example of would be Africa where can be seen that some world organisation come forward to help them through wealthy people. Such kinds of massive donation should only given to these kinds of credible organisation or charitable societies. Thus big charities have their own role in our society.
In my viewpoint, both types of charitable activities are good for well being of deprived community. It is essential to ensure that, this funds are given to needy people. Hence organisation must make their transaction more transparent. In addition local communities should extend their help for funding more needy people. Thus, both types of scheme can be helpful for our societal betterment.
320 WORDS , BAND 6.5
Buying things on the internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular. Do the merits of online shopping in this via outweigh than demerits.
In the twentieth century, technological boom can be seen everywhere. The main example is e-commerce through which people are always buying lots of things from the internet, such as flight tickets, reading materials and other essential items. However there are also many disadvantages behind this novel development. Here both the merits and demerits are being analyzed.
First and foremost, number of online shopping customers is increasing day by day. For instance, In 2010 developing countries like India had very few e-shopping sites but now it is difficult to take the numbers of companies in this area. When considering this increasing number it is apparent that business across the world in this sector is reaping benefits. Nowadays, people are very busy hence shopping from online platforms can save a significant amount of time. In addition, in the price rate a huge difference can be seen when comparing to offline market. Therefore online market gives a large amount benefits to human being.
Furthermore, it is well-known fact that physically challenged people find it difficult to purchase from markets. In such cases merits of online shopping cannot be denied. In the case of air tickets and train tickets people had to wait more time in queue to book tickets but now this difficulty is fading. In addition a reader can purchase books according to their interest from online very easily. Hence there are lots of merits in online purchasing.
However, there can be seen some disadvantages too. To exemplify, after booming of technology cyber crime has increased. Online intruders may hack and take valuable information such as bank details from people when shopping. However highly secured and authentic sites can not be hacked that easily. So owing to the multifarious benefits of online shopping, it is apparently not wastage of resource even if there are a few negative attributes.
To conclude, the e-commerce provide a wide range of benefits to people, this helps to save time as well as money.
350 words band 6
Students should pay their full university fees themselves as they benefit from having university studies and not the society as whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A nation standard mainly depend on educated citizen. There are some multitude claim that, the scholars who are studying at university is willing to pay their entire fee themselves and also not need to burden that fee from society. I completely disagree this statement due to, if students carried out their money, the rich community would be only get an education.
Firstly, it is an undeniable fact that, the education fare at universities are higher than compare to school , hence this big fare is difficult to adopt the normal person. Perhaps the best example of would be in the fee structure of medical seat in India, where average students only can study at merit seats, others seats carried out a huge amount of donation. Therefore, normal person cannot study high level of profession due to over burden.
Secondly, this scheme may be produce the ricer community to become more rich and poor region to more poor. The high university fare may be chance to reduce the education attraction from poor region, which has build negative impact on under developed community. This way the country might be developing a huge gap between wealthy and poor regions, hence this is not better for societal growth.
Finally, it is a well-known fact that, most of countries are willing to give their citizen to free education, sometimes, they offer free education and research scholarship to foreigners. For example, the country like Germany is fully, freely education to native and foreign people where, their fare from society, hence such place can see that high educated people.
To conclude, it is better to provide education fee from society or government. This not only useful for government, but helpful for students from lower region.
Environmental problems such as pollution and climatic variations are increasing nowadays. The governments have taken some measures at a global level. But they got only few solutions. Why is it so? How can this problem be solved?
In *this* contemporary era, pollution rates as well as climate changes are rising day by day why the authorities cannot take significant response to the world wide level? What are the measures have to solve this issue properly? This essay will analysis this both points.
Saving environment is not only the duty of government, but also *everyone's* responsibility, but nowadays, majority of *the* government cannot take individual decision to take solve this problem because of every country economy is directly depends on some multinational companies growth. It is the fact that, their main resource of that companies has been getting from environmental exploitation and also there are some laws are available for protection that companies policies. That is one of the reasons behind the government measures did not get more effect.
It is better to solve, *this issue by* international organizations. *they* must implement proper laws in ecological area. Perhaps the best example would be, recently, Kerala government ( a state of India ) banned the plastic bags in groceries. Which is helping to protect environment also very effective in waterlogging problem across the cities. Such kinds of initiate should be taken at international level for more protection, sometimes this is negatively affecting the production cost of items though government willing to give some subsidies for meet this issue. Moreover, government *should* support recycled energy source such as wind, solar, hydro electric power these are helping to protect the air pollution across the world.
To conclude, the authorities must implemented proper laws for supporting the economy and the environment *and* also *encourage* renewable energy sources.
Tourism has been a good source of revenue in many countries. Discuss its advantageous and disadvantageous?
The majority of countries , one of the best income source is the tourism, hence there is advantages outweigh than disadvantageous , but this essay will discuss both sides and finally include my view point also.
First and foremost, it is an undeniable fact that, most of the *nation'* backbone of revenue income *comes* from tourism. This way *they* produce local jobs across the tourist place and also where the person’s life expectancy is rising. In addition, foreigner through of attachment help to get good culture, which may be reduced the bad customs approach of the local region. Moreover foreigner can enhance their cultural knowledge and also get high rich history and cultural person from this. Thus, which have a get significant benefits to every national as well as people.
However, it is a well-known fact that, some negative results *are* seen from promoting tourism in some places. Perhaps the best example would be that, indigenous customs are vanishing through promoting tourism in the local area, where people might be adopted the better customs from visitors, that attitude may be vanish some traditional customs across the tourist area.Other main negative result is that, when promoting tourism, the tourist area of business rising, where the natural resource of exploitation chance is high.
To conclude, In my point of view, It is generally known to all, *that* owing to the multifarious benefits from tourism, it has apparently noted that, even if there are some negative attributes from tourism. Therefore,it is better to encourage tourism across the world.
corrected one
In most of the countries one of the best sources of income is tourism. I think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will discuss both sides and finally include my view point also.
People in all modern societies use drugs, but today's youth are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs, and at an increasing early ages. Some sociologists claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example.
Discuss the causes and some effects of widespread drug use by young people in modern day society. Make any recommendations you feel are necessary to help fight youth drug abuse.
|
|||
Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?
In the twentieth century, get jobs in rich countries is unquestionably one of the most trends and useful aspects in any society, and it supports should be taken seriously, hence some multitude claim that, the rich nation must be providing jobs for professional workers from poor world. I completely agree this point due to this is not only have benefits in rich countries but also poor countries also have tremendous advantages.
First and foremost, it is an undeniable fact that, getting high profession work at poor community is too difficult, because of lack of industries as well as high rate of unemployment. However, these conditions in a rich society is totally different, low level of population, where the employment opportunities are high and also their struggled to fill up their vacant seats. Perhaps the best example would be in European countries like Germany, nowadays, where getting jobs for impoverished communities are rising, so this way gets benefits both nations.
Secondly, it is a well-known fact that, if the poor citizens get a job from wealthy countries, it will useful for their family as well as society. For instance, In Kerala ( a state of India), where a majority of people work in the rich world like Gulf, thus which place of people 's life expectancy rose in addition to standard of living also gain. Therefore, this is high benefits to every country.
However, it is a fact that, the people, who live in poor country, when try to move abroad, this may chance to brain drain, but most of the cases the citizens come back after their work permits in that country their also like to live in own nation. Therefore, owing to the multi furious benefits of this system, it has apparently noted that, even if there are some negative attributes merits are more.
To conclude, this kind of encouraging from rich country must be supported and also enhanced for getting better society in the impoverished world.
| Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree? In the contemporary era, it can be seen that, wealthy nationals were given money to poor world for eradicating poverty, for long time ago, but where could not see that much development. Hence, it is unquestionably one of the most worrying situation in that society, and , it supports and others methods should be taken for less affluent nation from wealthy world. I completely agree this point due to, nowadays, this is a common problem around world, thus must be implement relevant solution to solve this problem. In the twentieth world, it is an undeniable fact that, a majority of poor nations can not recover, even if get large found from developed nations. Perhaps the best example would be the African countries, which place have been getting huge found from wealthy nations like America. However, there could not see that any improvement. Therefore, it is undoubted that, other efficient scheme should be implemented. First and fore most,it is a well-known fact that, lack of infrastructure and education are a prime reason for underdevelopment of such countries. Initially, this place of people should be given proper education and also provide the relevant vocational training, which would be generate educated society, then the rich countries should be given financial aid for developing infrastructure. Moreover, their have to ready for investing in this place. Furthermore, the rich countries must be taken and provide scholarship and jobs to students, who are from poor society. It is happy to see now, most of rich society now already starts this scheme. For example, in American and most of European Universities, where the education and placement opportunities are already begging that result could be seen in the developing country like India. Therefore, this way would be helping in the poor countries. To conclude, proper education and good opportunities for giving to the underdeveloped societies is the best way to reduce poverty in this place. Corrected one. |
In the twentieth world, it is an undeniable fact that a majority of poor nations can not recover, even if they get large found from developed nations. Perhaps the best example would be the African countries, which place have been getting huge found from wealthy nations like America. However, there could not see any improvement. Therefore, it is undoubted that, another efficient scheme should be implemented.
First and foremost,it is a well-known fact that lack of infrastructure and education is a prime reason for the underdevelopment of such countries. Initially, this place of people should be given proper education and also provide the relevant vocational training, which would be generated educated society, then the rich countries should be given financial aid for developing infrastructure. Moreover, they have to ready for investing in this place.
Furthermore, the rich countries must be taken and provide scholarship and jobs to students, who are from poor society. It is happy to see now, most of the rich society now already start this scheme. For
